Floods Leave Southeast Asia More Vulnerable to Food Price Shocks

Massive flooding in Thailand and elsewhere have destroyed large parcels of rice farmland, pushing rice prices up and leaving Southeast Asia at greater risk of a food price shock.

The rice-consuming region is under the threat of food supply shortages after heavy rains and massive flooding destroyed crops in Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam and the Philippines.

The United Nations says it is closely monitoring the potential for “serious food shortages” in several parts of Southeast Asia after floods affected agricultural activities and aid deliveries.

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) Global Information and Early Warning System, in a report released on Oct 21, says although no precise figures are available, continuous rain and flooding is estimated to have damaged at least 1.6 million hectares of standing crop in Thailand, representing more than 12% of total national cropped area. Another 12% of the total area under paddy in Cambodia is also believed to have been damaged.

About 6% of rice farmland is damaged in the Philippines, while in Vietnam it is reported that as much as 7.5% of the farmland is destroyed.

Yang Razali Kassim, a senior fellow and analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, says food security in Southeast Asia will certainly be affected by the floods in the region.

“The scale of the floods is unprecedented, and therefore, the threat on regional food security is also unprecedented. Rice supplies to the region is bound to be affected, adding to the pressure on food prices that have already seen rises in recent times due to shortages caused by erratic weather,” he said.

Before the floods, said to be the Thailand’s worst in the last 50 years, the Bangkok government forecast rice production to stand at 25.8 million tons. But, the government predicts it may lose some six million tons of rough-rice from flooding. Analysts say Thailand, which accounts for 30% of global rice exports, has already lost three million tons of rice due to floods.

The price of rice is hovering at about $650 per ton currently, but rice traders are expecting the price to increase to $750 per ton, inching closer to its record-high level of $1,000 per ton in 2008.

A rice trader in Malaysia, who did not want to be identified, told VOA global prices are expected to increase even further, with no sign of normalization in the near-term as the flood damages in Thailand and elsewhere are found to be worse than initially expected.

However, many Asian countries control rice prices via government subsidies, making it unlikely that price hikes will hit most consumers in the near term.

Kamal Malhotra, U.N. Resident Representative for Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei Darussalam, said rice farmers living below the poverty line are among the most vulnerable to the impact of the floods, as they are likely to have the least bargaining power, least resources to organize themselves collectively and are more likely to sit at the lowest end of the production chain.

“Whether price increase[s] will result in income increase[s] for the majority of those involved in rice production varies, subject to how the production chain is structured and the relative bargaining powers between farmers, distributors and retailers,” he says.

Malhotra said that while floods and other climatic conditions may cause price increases, the current high prices of rice and other food commodities are also partly cost-pushed due to fuel price hike and also the ongoing policy to replace food crops with cash crops.

“Without reversing some of these policies, food prices will be extremely volatile to short-term ‘shocks’ such as floods, subsequently affecting food security,” he said.

He added that shortages in food supplies are exacerbated by the possibility of panic-driven protectionism that may also push up prices.

Responding to the calamity, the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN) recently inked an agreement with China, Japan and South Korea to stockpile rice to be used during disasters or contingencies. Each of the countries agreed to provide a rice stock of 787,000 tons to tackle natural disasters.

In 2008, a global food price shock mainly driven by rising oil prices caused political and social unrests in several poor and developed countries. A World Bank report released on February 15 of this year said that continuously rising food prices have pushed another 44 million people into extreme poverty and exposed them more to hunger.

The floods that hit Southeast Asia have not only destroyed crops and livestock, but also claimed hundreds of lives and displaced thousands of people.

See more here:
Floods Leave Southeast Asia More Vulnerable to Food Price Shocks

UN Prosecutor Says ‘Clouds’ Hang Over Tribunal

The international prosecutor for the UN-backed Khmer Rouge tribunal says all the cases before the court need to be properly considered to lift the “cloud” currently hanging over it.

The court is preparing for its biggest trial to date, for four jailed regime leaders, but it has faced a rash of criticism in recent months over the investigating judges’ handling of two more cases at the court.

The international investigating judge announced his resignation last month over repeated statements by top officials in opposition to cases 003 and 004, and two international judges issued a harsh criticism for the investigating office’s improper handling of court documents related to both cases.

“It is certainly a problem,” Cayley told VOA Khmer in an interview this week at New Jersey’s Rutgers University, where he was holding a talk. “I warned people a while back that if cases 003 and 004 were dealt in that way they were being dealt, we would end up in this situation with fairly critical judgments.”

Investigating judges now must defend their work, he said.

“That’s why the law has to be followed,” he said. “Because then you don’t have to end up constantly explaining why things are being done as they are. Then you don’t end up with people having to resign in the midst of investigations or cases.”

Cases 003 and 004 accuse five senior Khmer Rouge members of atrocity crimes, but their full prosecution would require more indictments, something Prime Minister Hun Sen has said would create instability in the country. Those statements and others, echoed by Cambodian judges, have led to wide criticism that the court is under political pressure to put the cases to an end.

Both cases “need to come to some kind of legitimate conclusion,” Cayley said. “There needs to be due process. The law needs to be followed. The rules need to be followed. Otherwise it’s going to create a huge mess in the court. And nobody wants that on the national side or on the international side.”

Case 002, which charges Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith with atrocity crimes, including genocide, will see its first substantial hearing later this month.

“The commencement of Case 2 is going to be an issue that keeps everybody very busy,” Cayley said. “It’s a case that needs to move forward. I hope that it will lift some of the clouds that are hanging over the court in respect to cases 003 and 004.”

Case 002 will be the most complicated to date for the court, which has only tried Kaing Kek Iev, better known as Duch, for his role as supervisor of Tuol Sleng prison.

Cayley said he believes the case against the four leaders is strong, “because of the size and scope of the crimes that were committed.”

“There is documentary evidence that links them with the crimes on the ground including publications of the Khmer Rouge, and including other documentary evidence,” he said.

“Ultimately, it’s for the judges to decide whether or not these three individuals are connected with the crimes,” he added. “They’re presumed innocent until proven guilty. The prosecution has what’s called the burden of proof. We have to proof these crimes and their connections to them beyond a reasonable doubt. But I have every confidence that we will prove our case at trial.”

Once that case begins, however, the tribunal will still be dealing with pressure to reclaim legitimacy in the eyes of a growing number of critics.

“I find it very disappointing, and I hope​​ that the people at the court are very committed to this, as are people in the government,” said Alex Hinton, an expert in genocide and human rights at Rutgers. “I hope people can come together and reach an understanding that things must proceed in accordance with international standards.”

Sophal Ear, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School in the US, speaking personally, said, he had filed as a civil party complainant to seek “truth” and “retributive justice.”

Allegations of misconduct at the court affect its credibility, he said. “Are they serious about justice, or are they simply going through the motions to have what appears to be an experience, and to spend $150 million, possibly $250 million, in contributions from the world in the pursuit of justice?”

Sophal Ear said the court could regain confidence from people by moving forward on Cases 003 and 004.

“The actions of the Khmer Rouge tribunal ought to be based on a legal basis, and not on a political basis,” he said. “And right now it appears that things have proceeded on a political basis.”

Tribunal and government officials maintain that the court has not been under political pressure and is working to complete its work independently.

Sophal Ear spoke at Bard College in New York, where he was scheduled to give a presentation on the tribunal to students and professors.

Peter Maguire, a trustee at the college who organized the talk, said the UN must “finish what they’ve started.”

“I am shocked by how slow they’ve gone, especially when they know they have a limited time,” he said. “They know they have limited resources. They know they have limited political will. My feeling would be that they would be pushing as quick and as hard as possible to complete the trial of the senior leaders. And they haven’t.”

See more here:
UN Prosecutor Says ‘Clouds’ Hang Over Tribunal